Jio, Starlink, Airtel: Who stands to gain from India's satellite internet revolution?
While satellite broadband promises to unlock new audiences and markets, industry leaders disagree on whether better connectivity will translate into meaningful advertising opportunities
by
Published: Oct 22, 2026 8:42 AM | 8 min read
- India's digital industry is focusing on reaching the next 100 million internet users, primarily in rural areas, as satellite broadband services from companies like Starlink, Reliance Jio, and OneWeb are set to launch.
- Deloitte estimates that India's satellite broadband market could reach $1.9 billion by 2030, but questions remain about whether this technology will create new digital consumers or simply connect existing ones.
- Experts express skepticism about satellite broadband replicating the rapid subscriber growth seen during Jio's initial rollout, citing existing internet access issues and the need for reliable high-speed connectivity.
- The potential for advertising growth hinges on whether satellite connectivity can lead to meaningful consumer engagement and whether advertisers can demonstrate incremental reach and return on investment.
Every few months, India's digital industry rediscovers its favourite 100 million people. They are invariably the next 100 million internet users, generally residing somewhere in rural India, waiting to be connected, converted into consumers and, eventually, served an advertisement.
The industry has been talking about reaching them for years. Now, with Elon Musk's Starlink, Reliance Jio and Bharti-backed OneWeb preparing to bring satellite broadband to India, there is a new question: what happens when the internet starts arriving from space?
The timing is particularly interesting. Jio Platforms' brand new ₹30,213-crore initial public offering, India's largest, has drawn substantial investor interest, while Musk has publicly promised affordable Starlink services and accused powerful interests of slowing his company's entry. Reliance has rejected suggestions of obstruction, maintaining that its own satellite venture awaits regulatory approvals.
For all the rather earthly corporate sparring, there is a potentially substantial market at stake. Deloitte estimates that India's satellite broadband services market could reach $1.9 billion by 2030.
However, that is a connectivity opportunity, not an advertising revenue forecast. Whether the technology will translate into new viewers, shoppers and meaningful media investments is another matter entirely.
Also Read: Satellite internet is coming to India. Will advertising change with it?
Apple Pay won’t beat UPI in India. It may not need to
Who’s actually watching your CTV ad? India’s 200 million-plus-viewer measurement puzzle
The next million may already be online
India is hardly an undiscovered digital market. According to the IAMAI-Kantar Internet in India 2025 report, the country already has 958 million active internet users, with rural India accounting for approximately 57% of them.
The question, therefore, is whether satellite broadband will create genuinely new digital consumers or simply provide another means of connecting existing ones.
Nikhil Kumar, marketing leader and Connected Television advocate, argues that India's existing digital penetration makes the commercial proposition more complicated than satellite coverage figures might suggest.
"Satellite internet needs to demonstrate a meaningful incremental advantage—not simply promise to connect India," he says.
With inexpensive mobile data, widespread smartphone adoption and established digital consumption habits, Kumar believes satellite broadband's strongest proposition will be in specific geographical gaps, including remote communities, islands and areas with unreliable terrestrial connectivity.
"I would be cautious about calling satellite internet the next big driver of advertising reach," he says, adding that equipment and subscription costs could restrict the number of genuinely new consumers entering the addressable advertising market.
Prabhvir Sahmey, CEO and co-founder at Stratpulse Labs, is similarly sceptical that satellite broadband will reproduce the mass adoption witnessed during Jio's initial rollout, when the operator attracted 100 million subscribers within 170 days. "We cannot expect another Free Digital Revolution that happened in the early days of Jio," he says, arguing that the challenge today is not necessarily the absence of connectivity, but its bandwidth and quality. Figures support that distinction: Our World in Data estimates that more than 70% of Indians were using the internet by 2025, while a government survey found that 86.3% of households had internet access within their premises.
However, access does not necessarily mean reliable high-speed connectivity. An analysis by Ashoka University's Centre for Economic Data and Analysis found that just 3.8% of rural households had access through optical fibre, compared with 15.3% of urban households. Sahmey questions whether wider satellite coverage alone will produce significant commercial gains. Even if hundreds of millions more people eventually gain better connectivity, advertisers must consider whether the products and services they promote are available and accessible in those markets.
It is an important distinction. A consumer switching from mobile broadband to satellite internet does not automatically become an additional consumer available to advertisers.
As Tejas Maha, Associate Director – Media, White Rivers Media, observes, "A user switching from mobile broadband to satellite is still the same audience for a brand."
For advertisers, improved connectivity is valuable. Incremental reach, however, needs to be demonstrated rather than assumed.
The real opportunity may be behind the scenes
The economics of connectivity could determine how quickly this opportunity develops.
India's mobile data prices, estimated by Reuters at approximately eight US cents per gigabyte, present a formidable benchmark for satellite operators. With consumer tariffs yet to be established, the cost of terminals and subscriptions remains an important unknown.
Rupali Chavan, SVP and Head of Business at Mudra, believes the mass-market opportunity may not involve households installing satellite dishes at all.
"The bigger unlock is behind the scenes: satellites can link far-off mobile towers to the network, so telcos can bring cheap everyday data to villages they couldn't reach before," she explains.
Her argument shifts the focus from direct satellite subscriptions to satellite backhaul, where orbiting networks could support conventional mobile connectivity in areas that are expensive or difficult to serve.
"The next hundred million users will come online on a ₹200 mobile plan, not a satellite dish," Chavan predicts.
That outcome would depend on the economics of satellite backhaul and telecom deployment. Nevertheless, it illustrates why the companies providing connectivity may not necessarily be the same businesses capturing the eventual consumer spending.
The competitive picture is equally complicated. Jio and Airtel have previously signed agreements to explore distributing Starlink services in India, even as their own satellite interests compete in the same emerging market.
In other words, the battle for the customer may involve competitors helping one another reach that customer.
More screens, but how much more spending?
For advertisers, the immediate opportunity appears to lie in digital video, connected television and potentially commerce.
India already had an estimated 206.9 million connected-TV viewers in 2026, according to Ormax Media, representing 60% year-on-year growth. Reliable broadband in underserved locations could extend streaming access and potentially increase consumption on connected screens.
Somendu Singh, Chief Contributor at CTV Scale, takes a relatively optimistic view of this development. He argues that satellite connectivity could benefit community hubs, schools, small businesses and higher-income rural households, where individual connections might serve multiple users.
"Each of these connected points serves many viewers and consumers, so the effective audience grows faster than the subscriber count," Singh says.
He also sees potential in connected television, particularly as audiences in smaller markets gain access to interactive and addressable advertising formats.
Where Singh's argument becomes more ambitious is commerce. "Commerce stands to benefit the most," he says, pointing to opportunities for product discovery, shoppable formats and QR-led purchases across categories including FMCG, consumer durables, financial services and agricultural inputs.
Chavan, however, sees a more fundamental obstacle. "Commerce will follow last, because what limits sales in remote areas is getting the product delivered, not getting online."
It is a useful disagreement. Connectivity might make an advertisement viewable or a product discoverable, but neither guarantees affordable fulfilment, purchasing power or a completed transaction.
The potential for more commercial activity is real. Its scale, and the time required to achieve it, remain uncertain.
Will media buying actually change?
For all the technological complexity involved in delivering internet connectivity from orbit, the practical consequences for media agencies may be surprisingly ordinary.
An advertisement delivered over a satellite connection would still run through existing digital advertising platforms. Agencies would continue buying video, display, social and commerce media through established systems.
Angad Saimbi, Associate Director – Business and Growth at Yellow Seed, believes the immediate opportunity is extending the reach of existing channels rather than fundamentally changing media buying.
"Connectivity is only the first step; sustained digital consumption is what ultimately makes an audience commercially relevant to advertisers," he says.
Maha similarly argues that brands will need evidence of incremental reach and return on advertising spend before directing additional investment towards satellite-enabled audiences.
And even where connectivity enables more viewing, proving that the resulting audiences are genuinely new will remain a measurement challenge.
Two senior brand marketers who spoke to exchange4media without wanting to be identified expressed cautious interest in the opportunity. Both indicated that they would prefer to see how commercial services, adoption and the resulting consumer behaviour develop before drawing conclusions about advertising investments.
Their reservations reflect a larger industry dilemma: connectivity providers can promise coverage, but brands ultimately need evidence of consumption and commercial returns.
A new frontier, familiar questions
There are also regulatory and practical realities to consider.
Starlink, Jio's satellite venture and Bharti-backed OneWeb have received initial authorisations but continue to navigate outstanding spectrum and security requirements ahead of wider commercial operations.
Until services launch at scale, questions around pricing, subscriber adoption and audience behaviour will remain difficult to answer conclusively.
For Jio, the satellite opportunity arrives alongside the pressures of being India's largest telecom operator and a newly public company. For Starlink, it represents entry into an exceptionally price-sensitive connectivity market. For Airtel and its satellite interests, the challenge is finding where satellite capacity complements existing networks and commercial relationships.
For advertisers, the calculation is rather simpler.
India has already demonstrated that cheaper connectivity can create enormous digital businesses. Whether satellite broadband can repeat that achievement in the remaining underserved markets depends on how many people it brings online, what they do once connected, and whether businesses can profitably serve them.
Read more news about Digital Media, Internet Advertising, Marketing News, Television Media, Radio Media
For more updates, be socially connected with us onInstagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube & Google News
